SSPX LAITY GET INTO ACTION

30.04.2026

SSPX LAITY GET INTO ACTION

TRADS. IT’S TIME TO START MOVING. FILE PETITIONS, USE THE COLOURED GRAPHICS.

YOU HAVE A WHOLE NEW BODY OF KNOWLEDGE WHICH SUPPORTS TRADITION. USE IT.

Cardinals Fernandez, Roche, Cupich and others must become conservative now with Vatican Council II being rational, to avoid schism. The tables have changed.

Lay people who go for the Latin Mass at the SSPX chapels it is time to get smart. Cardinal Fernandez plans to excommunicate Catholic families too.
Your asset is the Catholic Faith, which Fernandez does not have. You have to bring out the Catholic Faith before him in a secular and canonical sense, until it ‘sinks in’.
Use the L.A DIAGRAMS/GRAPHICS to illustrate your points. Show how Cardinal Fernandez is irrational and not rational, dishonest and not honest, on Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the Catechism of Pope Pius X, the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston etc.
Cardinal Fernandez is a Catholic and ‘on our side’. He is not an enemy. He has to be shown how Vatican Council II can be magisterial and not magisterial, apostolic or not apostolic, with the hermeneutic of continuity or discontinuity. It is the same for Pope Leo.

This is a big job and would require resources- people who are capable of spreading the faith and acting on their own, their own initiative. If your bishop is a liberal, check him out officially.
He is using an irrational premise and inference to produce a schismatic conclusion, for political-left reasons.
The people do not know about it. The cardinals don’t know about it. He is avoiding the Anti Semitism and other leftist legal labels. He wants to protect the Church. So he seems ready to even follow Satan.

LEX ORANDI

But at Holy Mass we cannot change the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms irrationally and schismatically, as he does. This is not the lex orandi of the centuries of Catholicism.
Legally and canonically we cannot have a cardinal, bishop or priest, who uses a Fake Premise and Inference, to produce a schismatic conclusion (example visible LG 16 is an explicit exception for EENS) and does not tell the congregation in the pew about it.
For instance, like Cardinal Fernandez, Bishop Michael Olsen in Texas, USA, uses the same False Premise and Inference and he was not corrected legally, when he and Fernandez excommunicated the Arlington Discalced Carmelite Nuns in Texas.
Using a Fake Premise – is a lie. It may be a misdemeanor.
Don’t let Cardinal Fernandez excommunicate the SSPX without a push back from the SSPX laity.

Remember, the 1980 Code of Canon Law is based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and so you may have to choose other ways to get justice done in the Catholic Church.
We now have the format (the graphics.). We simply present it and let the truth push for itself.
Ask questions.
1. How can you legally have a liberal bishop when Vatican Council II interpreted rationally is traditional and not schismatic?
2.Why must the bishops of the SSPX, the mainline Church, the sedevacantists and the Ecclesia Dei communities, be allowed to interpret Vatican Council II only irrationally, to produce schism with the Church Fathers and popes of the Middle Ages ? How can this be apostolic?
Get into action. You have all the material before you. Use it.
How can Cardinal Fernandez interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and dishonestly and then excommunicate the SSPX for not approving it? Why must they ordain bishops with the permission of Pope Leo, who interprets Magisterial Documents irrationally, dishonestly and schismatically?
Why must they accept papal documents based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally?
Trads. Get the machine rolling.
- Lionel Andrades
Creator of the Lionel Andrades diagrams/ graphics.

29.04.2026

IT IS DISHONESTY WHEN VATICAN COUNCIL II IS INTERPRETED IRRATIONALLY TO PRODUCE A LIBERAL CONCLUSION AND THEN THERE IS A THREAT OF EXCOMMUNICATION FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT ACCEPT IT
IT IS DISHONESTY WHEN VATICAN COUNCIL II IS …